REVIEW: RGV drafts a confusing Contract
There's a particular scene in Contract where a murder takes place inside a dark cinema hall and no one even bats an eyelid. Varma weaves in many such moments to drive home the central theme of the film – you can ignore crime, but crime won't ignore you. But coming back to that particularly long scene – Varma chooses to play dialogues from The Departed while the murder happens and the killer goes back to his seat to watch the film. The reference to Martin Scorsese's classic gangster tale is not incidental.
Clearly the germ for making Contract came from this film… Or in Varmaspeak, it's perhaps his tribute to a film that has influenced him deeply (Remember the opening credits of Sarkar?). Like The Departed, Contract is also about intelligence forces planting their own man as an undercover mole into the underworld.
The rules of the Contract
Ex-Army man Aman (Advik Mahajan) is happy with his civil life and couldn't care less about the crime around him – till one fine day when he loses his family in a bomb blast. An intelligence officer convinces Aman to join underworld big boss RD and spy on his gang. RD's biggest rival is a smuggler named Goonga, who is connected to the world's most wanted Afghan terrorist, Sultan. Aman's mission is to eliminate RD, join Goonga and eventually nab Sultan. But soon Aman discovers the deep nexus between the Mumbai underworld and international terrorist outfits. A nexus that involves top cops and senior politicians…
Too many clauses to this Contract
On the face of it, Contract has an interesting premise. In Varma's own words, if Satya was an insider's view and Company was an overview of the underworld, Contract aims to showcase a horrifying, new face of the underworld that goes way beyond extortion threats. But he falters big time in the execution. In his attempt to show the deep-rooted network between the lawmakers and lawbreakers, he introduces too many characters and sub-plots. Beyond a point, it is just impossible to keep track of who is doing what in the film.
Next Page: RGV's newest prodigy













Yess i agree - rgv makes better movies than anyone in
bollywood..That is the truth ... Approach of film making is
entirely different. He is the trend setter ... He does not
care about box office. In general hit or flopp is based on
money where as rgv films can't be compared with money based
box office ... Who cares...
Jesus christ.........Rgv is one of the best
filmmakers.....This is holy s@#$.....He better gho back and
open a video rental shop.....This guy is a 5 film wonder and
dis comes frm a ex-ramu fan.....He tries to make contract
realistic..But it turns out to be ekta kapoor k-thriller
with great background scores.....I agree other filmmakers
suck except for gems like aamir khan......But please ramu
's movies will always remain holy s@#$
I will go with u , i am a rgv fan bt this time he totally
falters with mixing of underworld with terrorism ....N the
portagonist is just not fitting in many scenes of the films
. Rgv shld have been more specific with what he wants to
convey and the end in which the hero kills sultan is shame
for rgv ....Standing at one place and killing everyone with
his gun . Yes villains and the commisioner who was the main
villain in ab tak chhapan are good to watch
Losers..Just because it is a rgv film you guys have a
problem with everything..Even the size of the toe nail of
the hero or the length of the leaf shown in any particular
scene.
if the movie is from an banner or actor whose bankroll you
are on, then it is coated with gold...Shame on you guys..
rgv makes better movies than anyone in bollywood..That is
the truth ...