REVIEW: Watch Bhram with a painkiller
When you're about to go for a movie that you know can be potentially disastrous, go with absolutely no expectations at all. With Bhram, we went with the zero expectations and still came out extremely disappointed.
As the credits begin to flash on screen, you might think that the film deals with the lives of the rich and the glamorous. We see models whose acting skills have nothing to write home about and gay designers who only make exaggerated feline gestures. But this isn't what the story is about in the beginning, the middle or even the end!
A happy-go-lucky bachelor, Shaan (Dino Morea) won't settle down easily. But when fate brings him face-to-face with Antra (Sheetal Menon), a disturbed model with a shady past, he is suddenly intrigued. Not only is he in love but he is also miraculously willing to commit. And so after popping the question, he decides to introduce her to his brother Dev (Milind Soman) and sister-in-law (Simone Singh).
Just when things seem like they couldn't get peachier, Shaan's entire world is turned upside-down. Antra accuses Dev of a heinous crime which she insists she had witnessed as a kid. Thereon the film abruptly takes us to the scenic Kulu and Manali where Shaan tries to get to the bottom of things with the help of his friend Prem (Chetan Hansraj).
URBANEYE
Its common knowledge that reviews are rigged for one reason
or another..Either for or against a film. But hey you guys
at buzz 18..Earn your keep chums ..At least get the timings
of the film right so that there is a wee bit more
credibility in your so called 'review'..Or bro/sis
who will trust you with panning a film again? Dhande ka
vaanda mat karo yaar.
whoa...This was one hell of a tell tale ...A two hr film
she claims to have seen ..And makes it 2 hr 45 minutes.. How
can anything else hold water.? Its obviously dushmani
..Filmi kind
'saazish'..'revenge..'badla'..
and this reviewer then replies via others, sometimes with
an excuse of seeing another version.. And now a press
screening!! The film was 2 hours even for the press.. I
confirmed with one of your jaatwalas.Now tell me.. What is
your next move.
maybe you saw race :)
'pen on sale'..Hahaha...But brains missing.
Hahahaha.... Its funny how you guys are getting your
knickers in a twist over a movie like this. Sometimes you
can just tell from a preview how a movie will turn out.
Anyway, so the timing's warped.... But havent you guys
heard of a press screening? But of course it doesnt matter
does it?
If a reviewer writes the film is 2 hours 45 minutes when it
is actually only 2 hours then there is no doubt that
definitely some hanky panky is on . This review has been
undoubtedly planted.
in any cse journalists today are considered those who were
flops at all other jobs. And a movie critic has an added
qualification' depressed, disgruntled demonic traits,
as a must.
i have seen the film and it seemed as if you were talking
of some other film..That far removed from truth is your
rant. It may have not been perfect.. No film is but this
venom is definitely for other motives.
'pen on sale" is correct.
'
I agree completely with all angry and shocked comments
here..This review is definitely been planted here. Or else
it is unconceivable that a reviewer who has actually seen
the film will mistake the length of the movie by a whole
hour!!!
all these dimwitted nitwits who deem themselves reviewers
are basically nothing but a pen on sale!!!
I saw bhram first day first show...So there is no question
of producers having changed the length later. This is about
proving that this review has been planted!!!
everyone knows who owns this site..Also the antecedents of
people who write here, their intentions in planting this
review and under whose instructions. Magnates and moghuls
..Care a damn!!!
and i find it dubious that some rahul is covering up for
the reviewer. I know you are part of the industry ..Is it
that difficult to guess??
you and this reviewer have only helped corroborate my
point.
what a bunch of losers.
behram..Spot on buddy.
buzz 18 sucks big time!!
I have seen a almost four-hour long version of jodhaa akbar
and also a three hour-30-something minute-long one as well.
I am part of the industry and i know that producers tend to
take a call on their film's length even after the
prints have gone to the theatres. Chances are that this
critic and you watched different versions of the same film.
Not that i agree with all critics (buzz18 or otherwise) but
i personally feel it is unfair to cast aspersions on
someone's credentials... Just because they have one
fact that may or may not be right. Either way, 2.45 or
1.45... Bhram sucks big time.
Cannot respond tp your 'review'.. If you have the
guts to call it so.. Since it is blatantly written for other
reasons than fair reviewing. The film was 2 hours.. I know
because i went for it and you ofcourse didnt. Dont bother
editing that detail and setting it right.. Since these pages
have been cached. I have nothing to do with the film but all
i see is a case of some kind of hit campaign happening..This
review proves it all.. Your site has lost credibility
forever. I know who owns it. Quite digusting!!
What a lot of trash!! Have you seen the film? Definitely
not. This review has been 'fed' to you. The simple
fact that the film is under 2 hours and you have quoted it
as being 2hrs 45 minutes is self evident that nullifies the
rest of you review . So who are you getting even with ?
Magna?
lol..You guys are so unscrupulous its funny! Whatever you
say you cannot bring a well made film down.